Awards
| Award Date | Issue | Award |
|---|---|---|
| March 2022 | The Respondent challenged GTA jurisdiction due to alleged non-compliance with Rule 17 of the GTA Trade Rules - Interim award |
 GTA Arb 346 - Interim Award.pdf
Size: 673.19 KB Updated: 7 April 2022 |
| June 2021 | The Respondent did not take delivery of grain alleging an underlying agreement that they were not obliged to take the grain if they did not need it. |
GTA Arb 339 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 595.39 KB Updated: 16 September 2022 |
| June 2021 | The Respondent did not wash out the contract upon receiving the Claimant's Notice of Insolvency |
GTA Arb 336 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 827.09 KB Updated: 24 June 2021 |
| June 2021 | The Respondent did not complete execution of the contract after claiming COVID impacted performance, quality issues with delivered grain and allegations of Fraud by Claimant's Agent. |
GTA Arb 335 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 851.62 KB Updated: 24 June 2021 |
| May 2021 | Was the Respondent in repudiatory breach of contract, and was the Claimant entitled to terminate the contract? |
GTA Arb 333 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 1.07 MB Updated: 13 May 2021 |
| October 2020 | Respondent challenges GTA jurisdiction over almond hull contracts - Interim award |
Arb 319_320_321 - Interim Award.pdf
Size: 256.57 KB Updated: 24 October 2020 |
| August 2020 | Failure to deliver following allegedly rejected load |
GTA Arb 318 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 277.1 KB Updated: 23 August 2020 |
| July 2020 | Were the contracts capable of assignment? |
GTA Arb 312 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 256.21 KB Updated: 29 September 2020 |
| May 2020 | Were the GTA Dispute Resolution Rules incorporated into the contract? |
Arb 314 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 200.93 KB Updated: 23 August 2020 |
| February 2020 | Can a contract be cancelled based on a "Subject to sample approval" clause? |
Arb 299 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 161.98 KB Updated: 23 August 2020 |
