Awards
| Award Date | Issue | Award |
|---|---|---|
| August 2020 | Failure to deliver following allegedly rejected load |
 GTA Arb 318 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 277.1 KB Updated: 23 August 2020 |
| July 2020 | Were the contracts capable of assignment? |
GTA Arb 312 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 256.21 KB Updated: 29 September 2020 |
| May 2020 | Were the GTA Dispute Resolution Rules incorporated into the contract? |
Arb 314 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 200.93 KB Updated: 23 August 2020 |
| February 2020 | Can a contract be cancelled based on a "Subject to sample approval" clause? |
Arb 299 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 161.98 KB Updated: 23 August 2020 |
| April 2019 | What date should the contract washout be calculated on? |
Arb 293 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 133.54 KB Updated: 23 August 2020 |
| March 2019 | No shipping instructions for delivery provided. |
GTA Arb 283 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 353.3 KB Updated: 24 August 2020 |
| December 2018 | Were sufficient instructions issued for the purposes of a Buyer’s Call contract? |
Arb 286 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 136.02 KB Updated: 11 December 2018 |
| December 2018 | The giving of notice is essential to the operation of Trade Rule 13.3.1. |
Arb 284 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 264.1 KB Updated: 24 August 2020 |
| December 2018 | The giving of notice is essential to the operation of Trade Rule 13.3.1. |
Arb 285 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 258.05 KB Updated: 23 August 2020 |
| October 2018 | The onus is largely on the Buyer to initiate and orchestrate the delivery process |
Arb 216 - Final Award.pdf
Size: 212.65 KB Updated: 2 November 2018 |
